Fastloaders?

Basic and Machine Language

Moderator: Moderators

wimoos
Vic 20 Afficionado
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:15 am
Website: http://wimbasic.webs.com
Location: Netherlands
Occupation: farmer

Re: Fastloaders?

Post by wimoos »

WimBasic saves a program of 27904 bytes to tape in 1'54''.

Regards
VICE; selfwritten 65asmgen; tasm; maintainer of WimBasic
User avatar
AndyH
Vic 20 Afficionado
Posts: 364
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 5:51 am
Website: https://www.hewco.uk
Location: UK
Occupation: Developer

Re: Fastloaders?

Post by AndyH »

That's superb. Have you hit any reliability problems on duplication at that speed?

I guess for the fast load part of this puzzle, I have several problems to resolve - getting my program fully into memory to then save it out using a fastload routine. Then creating a loader capable to bringing it back in. I guess this is not going to be practical with WimBasic?
--
AndyH
HEWCO | Vic 20 blog
wimoos
Vic 20 Afficionado
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:15 am
Website: http://wimbasic.webs.com
Location: Netherlands
Occupation: farmer

Re: Fastloaders?

Post by wimoos »

No duplication tests done, so I wouldn't know about reliability.

WimBasic holds the loader. Being 8K in size, it is a pretty heavy solution to load WimBasic from tape first, in order to benefit from fast loading your program.
Only if your program is written in WimBasic, then this scenario could be useful.

But, the sources of the load- and save- routines are available for you to look into and use, so you could maybe combine with your own solution.

Regards,
VICE; selfwritten 65asmgen; tasm; maintainer of WimBasic
Post Reply