Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Discuss anything related to the VIC
Post Reply
Boray
Musical Smurf
Posts: 4064
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 10:47 am

Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by Boray »

I wrote these comparisons between the Plus/4 and the Vic-20 and C64 a few months ago. I have now translated them from Swedish into English. Here you go:

English:
Plus/4 vs Vic-20: http://www.boray.se/commodore/plus4-vic20-eng.pdf
Plus/4 vs C64: http://www.boray.se/commodore/plus4-c64-eng.pdf

Swedish:
Plus/4 vs Vic-20: http://www.boray.se/commodore/plus4-vic20.pdf
Plus/4 vs C64: http://www.boray.se/commodore/plus4-c64.pdf
PRG Starter - a VICE helper / Vic Software (Boray Gammon, SD2IEC music player, Vic Disk Menu, Tribbles, Mega Omega, How Many 8K etc.)
User avatar
joshuadenmark
Big Mover
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:32 am
Location: Fr-Havn, Denmark
Occupation: Service engineer

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by joshuadenmark »

Thanks, great comparisons :D
Kind regards, Peter.
____________________________________________________
In need of a wiki logon - PM me
User avatar
orion70
VICtalian
Posts: 4272
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:45 am
Location: Piacenza, Italy
Occupation: Biologist

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by orion70 »

Plus/4 is an overall winner - makes me want to pull it from dust and give it a go :)
As for the number of games though, 5.000 seems a bit overestimated, as a lot of them in plus4world are doubles in different languages (pirated copies etc.), and most are low-quality 16k programs anyway. I'd suggest for the Plus/4 beginner to try the top 10 from that site first. Also, some utilities are very well done, and surpass the C64 ones in many ways (see SVS-calc for example).
norm8332
Vic 20 Afficionado
Posts: 333
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2016 11:04 am
Location: USA

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by norm8332 »

And for people in areas with NTSC there are even fewer "good" games because most are PAL.
“In religion and politics people’s beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second-hand, and without examination... whose opinions about them were not worth a brass farthing.”

-Autobiography of Mark Twain
Boray
Musical Smurf
Posts: 4064
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 10:47 am

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by Boray »

Orion: ...but that probably goes for the 2.300 Vic-20 games as well. A lot of early 80's homebrew unexpanded basic games in there :)
PRG Starter - a VICE helper / Vic Software (Boray Gammon, SD2IEC music player, Vic Disk Menu, Tribbles, Mega Omega, How Many 8K etc.)
User avatar
orion70
VICtalian
Posts: 4272
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:45 am
Location: Piacenza, Italy
Occupation: Biologist

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by orion70 »

Sad but true :)
User avatar
joshuadenmark
Big Mover
Posts: 1178
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 11:32 am
Location: Fr-Havn, Denmark
Occupation: Service engineer

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by joshuadenmark »

The Plus/4 is the most beautiful Commodore ever - I just love the design!
Kind regards, Peter.
____________________________________________________
In need of a wiki logon - PM me
User avatar
orion70
VICtalian
Posts: 4272
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:45 am
Location: Piacenza, Italy
Occupation: Biologist

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by orion70 »

Looks like the perfect design for Commander Koenig in fact :P
User avatar
J.E.E.K.
Vic 20 Drifter
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 12:31 pm
Website: http://klasek.at/8bit
Location: AT

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by J.E.E.K. »

Boray wrote:I wrote these comparisons between the Plus/4 and the Vic-20 and C64 a few months ago. I have now translated them from Swedish into English. Here you go:

English:
Plus/4 vs Vic-20: http://www.boray.se/commodore/plus4-vic20-eng.pdf
Plus/4 vs C64: http://www.boray.se/commodore/plus4-c64-eng.pdf
Just want to add something which might be worth to mention too (for both):
When it comes to Basic, the Plus/4 has 60K of free memory while the C64 basic only can use 38K.
Not only the memory, but also the memory management has changed in several ways. Not only that banked access method uses RAM which is covered by ROM (leading to the above statement), but also for strings: The garbage collector has a linear run-time behavior (in opposite to the quadratic algorithm of BASIC V2 found in the VIC 20 and C64) where string oriented programs won't suffer anymore.
User avatar
Victragic
Frogger '07
Posts: 599
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 5:56 pm
Location: South Australia

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by Victragic »

I owned a Vic, Plus/4 and then C64 back in the mid 80s. My favourite by far was the Plus/4.

The display actually looked decent out of the box on a PAL screen - far fewer interference lines and smaller borders than the other two.

Little things like a reset button, built in machine code monitor and native disk commands were nice features.

I loathed that it was orphaned by Commodore from almost the day it was built - and I got burned by some terrible C16 ports of games from other systems, leading me to eventually buy a second-hand C64 purely for games.

We bought the script/plus cart and a printer, and used it for word processing. I also recall typing in a database program designed for the C128 and used that for several things.

Sadly my current plus/4 doesn't work, and that highlights one of the main problems with the line - they were just not built to last.
3^4 is 81.0000001
English Invader
Vic 20 Scientist
Posts: 1186
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 3:51 pm

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by English Invader »

Not sure what you mean by the C64 and the VIC having a "real" reset button. I have one in the user port and there are some C64 games where the system can't be reset properly without turning the power off (Mayhem in Monsterland, for instance). The Mega-Cart reset button with the VIC is very effective, though.

Would an internal one connected directly to the motherboard be any better?
User avatar
Mike
Herr VC
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 1:57 pm
Location: Munich, Germany
Occupation: electrical engineer

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by Mike »

English Invader wrote:Not sure what you mean by the C64 and the VIC having a "real" reset button.
I presume you meant '... not having a "real" reset button'?
I have one in the user port and there are some C64 games where the system can't be reset properly without turning the power off (Mayhem in Monsterland, for instance).
The standard user port reset buttons deliver a somewhat unclean reset "pulse" due to key bounce. But they work quite as well, as long as a program/game doesn't put a cartridge autostart signature into RAM at $8000 (C64) or $A000 (VIC-20), which can easily be used to prevent the average 'nosy' user to reset the computer and then take a peek at the game code. ;)
The Mega-Cart reset button with the VIC is very effective, though.
That comes because the Mega-Cart firmware maps its own firmware (with cartridge signature) into the BLK5 area upon that reset. This effectively disables any other (softloaded) cartridge autostart header and ensures the Mega-Cart menu starts up as intended. That reset button also features a little bit of extra circuitry to provide a cleaner reset pulse, but it's the map-in feature that does 99% of the work.

The map-in feature however wouldn't work as intended with an external reset - because external reset buttons don't provide the signal necessary for the ROM bank latch to re-init it to map in the Mega-Cart firmware. It's explicitly stated in the Mega-Cart manual, that only the reset button of the Mega-Cart should be used.
Would an internal one connected directly to the motherboard be any better?
See above answer.
Doppleganger
Vic 20 Dabbler
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 2:12 pm
Website: http://www.doppleganger.org
Location: Phelps, NY
Occupation: Deskside Geek

Re: Vic-20 vs Plus/4 (and C64 vs Plus/4)

Post by Doppleganger »

The keyboard cable on the VIC is FAR superior to the Plus/4, though... 8)
-Jay
Vic-20 User Since 1982'ish.
Post Reply